USA Authorized Hawaiian Harmony Retailer+1 (877) 257 0710on the bottle180-day window, from purchase30 servings · one a day
HawaiianzharmonyLabel · Dose · Window

About this site

An authorised retail site, not the manufacturer, and written to a set of rules it is willing to be held to.

Who we are

Site
Hawaiianzharmony, hawaiianzharmony.com
Role
USA Authorized Hawaiian Harmony Retailer
Market
United States
Editorial
The Hawaiianzharmony editorial desk. Last updated 24 September 2026.
Office
1500 Broadway, Floor 6, New York, NY 10036, USA
Returns
300 Park Avenue, Floor 17, New York, NY 10022, USA
This site
[email protected] · Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:00pm ET · Pages, typos, privacy, press
On the bottle
+1 (877) 257 0710 · [email protected]

What this site will not do

  • Invent a number. Where something was not supplied it is written down as not supplied. There are nine such items and they have their own section, plus ten blend ingredients for which no published dose was found.
  • Publish a review. No customer reviews, no star rating from any other source, and no Review or AggregateRating structured data anywhere.
  • Cite a study it has not opened. Sixteen sources, all read, all linked, on one page.
  • Reconcile a conflict by guessing. Where the bottle and the written pack disagree, both are printed and the bottle is followed. There are four such conflicts on this product.
  • Print an affiliate or redirect link in the copy.
  • Treat a seal as a test result. Four marks were supplied; each is described as what it actually is.
  • Hide a useful fact because it is awkward. The bottle prints a phone number the sales pages do not, and it is published here.

How this site is built

Every page is generated from a single file of facts. A figure appears on a page because it is in that file, and it is in that file because it is printed on the label artwork, typed in the written pack, or quoted from one of the sixteen sources. Changing a fact changes it everywhere at once, which is the only way a site with this many numbers stays consistent.

The arithmetic is deliberately simple: division, and the descending-order rule. Anything that needed a model rather than a division was left out.

Correcting it

Our score, and its method

1.6out of 5

The Hawaiianzharmony editorial desk, 24 September 2026

  1. Label completeness3.5

    The panel carries what FDA's guide asks for: serving size, servings per container, calories, the declared nutrient with its amount and %DV, the blend with its total weight, all four footnotes, the inactive list, a caution, storage and a distributor. It also carries extract ratios, which many labels do not.

  2. Dose transparency0.5

    99.95% of the declared weight is one line with twenty-one names. This is the least legible panel in this series to date.

  3. Evidence at a reachable dose0.5

    Eleven of the twenty-one have a published daily amount in a source we opened. Not one is reachable at its own arithmetic ceiling. Ten have no published amount at all, and for one the monograph says so explicitly.

  4. Seller identification1.5

    Four names, a PO box against two Manhattan addresses, and a support email at a fourth company. The one redeeming detail is that the bottle prints a phone number the sales pages do not.

  5. Price and refund clarity3.0

    Three prices, internally consistent, and a 180-day window that is long by the standards of this category. Marked down because the seller's own judging period runs past its own refund window and no pack sold covers the far end of it.

  6. Claim consistency1.0

    The bottle says blood sugar; the checkout says cognition; the keywords say diabetes. The written pack had to warn against mixing formulas.

  7. Review honesty1.0

    Eight named testimonials carrying two sentences between them, a headline average that does not match its own distribution, and a stated waiting time four to ten times shorter than the sales page's own.

This is our score, not a customer rating and not an average of anything supplied with the product. It is the mean of the seven figures above, each argued for in the sentence beside it. No star rating from any other source appears anywhere on this site.